Bhutan vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance score
Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time
- Bhutan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 63.87 0-100 against 63.69 0-100 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.18 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Montenegro ahead.
Bhutan ranks 71st and Montenegro ranks 72nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.24 0-100 | 48.13 0-100 | 6.89 0-100 | Montenegro |
| 2000s | 46.18 0-100 | 55.75 0-100 | 9.58 0-100 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 59.79 0-100 | 58.89 0-100 | 0.8991 0-100 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 62.64 0-100 | 60.25 0-100 | 2.4 0-100 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Bhutan or Montenegro?
- Bhutan, at 63.87 0-100 against 63.69 0-100 in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Bhutan and Montenegro?
- 0.18 0-100, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Montenegro?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Montenegro rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Bhutan ranks 71st and Montenegro ranks 72nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).