Bangladesh vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Bangladesh
36.53 0-100
in 2024
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
35.61 0-100
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
164th
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
167th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 36.53 0-100 against 35.61 0-100 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.92 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 164th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 167th of 206 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Congo, Democratic Republic of the Difference Ahead
1990s 51.02 0-100 23.64 0-100 27.38 0-100 Bangladesh
2000s 47.5 0-100 31.13 0-100 16.37 0-100 Bangladesh
2010s 43.71 0-100 32.81 0-100 10.9 0-100 Bangladesh
2020s 37.84 0-100 36.72 0-100 1.12 0-100 Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Bangladesh or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
Bangladesh, at 36.53 0-100 against 35.61 0-100 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Bangladesh and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
0.92 0-100, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Bangladesh ranks 164th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 167th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bangladesh/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bangladesh/congo-dem-rep/">Bangladesh vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).