San Marino vs Uruguay: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- San Marino
- Uruguay
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2000s | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2010s | 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0297 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, San Marino or Uruguay?
- San Marino, at 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between San Marino and Uruguay?
- 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Uruguay?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do San Marino and Uruguay rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- San Marino ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.