Rwanda vs Thailand: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Rwanda
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports -0.5598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0291 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Thailand ahead.
Rwanda ranks 132nd and Thailand ranks 131st of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Thailand |
| 2000s | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Thailand |
| 2010s | -0.8539 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Thailand |
| 2020s | -0.5816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Rwanda or Thailand?
- Thailand, at -0.5598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Rwanda and Thailand?
- 0.0291 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Thailand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Thailand rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Rwanda ranks 132nd and Thailand ranks 131st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.