Romania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Romania
0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
0.4063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Romania rank
73rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
70th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Romania
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.60.8199620102024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.4063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania, a difference of 0.0189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Romania ranks 73rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 70th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6922 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5839 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.3645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5434 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.4306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Romania or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.4063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Romania and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Romania and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Romania ranks 73rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 70th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/romania/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/romania/trinidad-and-tobago/">Romania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.