Peru vs Singapore: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Peru
- Singapore
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.0456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Singapore, a difference of 0.0073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Singapore ahead.
Peru ranks 98th and Singapore ranks 99th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6563 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.1126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.2859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.1831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1147 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Peru or Singapore?
- Peru, at 0.0456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Peru and Singapore?
- 0.0073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Singapore rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Peru ranks 98th and Singapore ranks 99th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.