New Caledonia vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- New Caledonia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.7309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.1196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 57th and Saint Lucia ranks 60th of 206 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.774 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.8904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, New Caledonia or Saint Lucia?
- New Caledonia, at 0.7309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between New Caledonia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.1196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Saint Lucia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Saint Lucia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- New Caledonia ranks 57th and Saint Lucia ranks 60th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.