Nauru vs Panama: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Nauru
0.5405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Panama
0.4784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Nauru rank
71st
Panama rank
74th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Nauru
  • Panama
0.20.40.60.81199620102025

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.5405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Panama, a difference of 0.0621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 71st and Panama ranks 74th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nauru
2000s 0.9758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nauru
2010s 0.7946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nauru
2020s 0.4042 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Nauru or Panama?
Nauru, at 0.5405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Panama as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Nauru and Panama?
0.0621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Panama?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Nauru and Panama rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Nauru ranks 71st and Panama ranks 74th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Panama: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/panama/">Nauru vs Panama: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.