Mozambique vs Uganda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Mozambique
-1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Uganda
-1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mozambique rank
155th
Uganda rank
156th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Mozambique
  • Uganda
-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uganda, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 155th and Uganda ranks 156th of 206 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3163 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2000s -0.1332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2010s -0.4712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2526 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2020s -0.8012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Mozambique or Uganda?
Mozambique, at -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Mozambique and Uganda?
0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uganda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Mozambique and Uganda rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Mozambique ranks 155th and Uganda ranks 156th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Uganda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mozambique/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mozambique/uganda/">Mozambique vs Uganda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.