Mongolia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Mongolia
0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0.1647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mongolia rank
92nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
90th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Mongolia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.10.20.30.40.5199620102024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.1647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mongolia ranks 92nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.2544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2010s 0.1649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.1513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Mongolia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.1647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Mongolia ranks 92nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mongolia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mongolia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mongolia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.