Monaco vs Virgin Islands U.S.: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Monaco
0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Virgin Islands U.S.
0.8331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2017
Monaco rank
50th
Virgin Islands U.S. rank
51st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Monaco
  • Virgin Islands U.S.
00.250.50.7511.2199620102024

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Virgin Islands U.S., a difference of 0.0037 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Monaco ahead.

Monaco ranks 50th and Virgin Islands U.S. ranks 51st of 206 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Monaco averaged higher in 1 and Virgin Islands U.S. in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco Virgin Islands U.S. Difference Ahead
2000s 0.8932 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8117 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Monaco
2010s 0.7566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8347 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Virgin Islands U.S.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Monaco or Virgin Islands U.S.?
Monaco, at 0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Virgin Islands U.S. as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Monaco and Virgin Islands U.S.?
0.0037 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Virgin Islands U.S.?
14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
How do Monaco and Virgin Islands U.S. rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Monaco ranks 50th and Virgin Islands U.S. ranks 51st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs Virgin Islands U.S.: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/monaco/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/monaco/virgin-islands-u-s/">Monaco vs Virgin Islands U.S.: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.