Monaco vs United States: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Monaco
0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
United States
0.887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Monaco rank
50th
United States rank
48th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Monaco
  • United States
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.0502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Monaco's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was United States ahead.

Monaco ranks 50th and United States ranks 48th of 206 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco United States Difference Ahead
1990s 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States
2000s 0.9322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States
2010s 0.7744 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States
2020s 0.8714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Monaco or United States?
United States, at 0.887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Monaco and United States?
0.0502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and United States?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Monaco and United States rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Monaco ranks 50th and United States ranks 48th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs United States: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/monaco/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/monaco/united-states/">Monaco vs United States: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.