Monaco vs Tonga: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Monaco
- Tonga
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga, a difference of 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Monaco ahead.
Monaco ranks 50th and Tonga ranks 52nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Monaco averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2000s | 0.9322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2010s | 0.7744 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4347 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 0.8714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Monaco or Tonga?
- Monaco, at 0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Monaco and Tonga?
- 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Tonga?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Monaco and Tonga rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Monaco ranks 50th and Tonga ranks 52nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.