Monaco vs Palau: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Monaco
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.0723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.1 times Monaco's.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Monaco ranks 43rd and Palau ranks 41st of 208 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2000s | 0.9461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palau |
| 2010s | 0.8377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palau |
| 2020s | 0.962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Monaco or Palau?
- Palau, at 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Monaco and Palau?
- 0.0723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Palau?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Monaco and Palau rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Monaco ranks 43rd and Palau ranks 41st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.