Marshall Islands vs Samoa: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Marshall Islands
0.9226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Samoa
0.9158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Marshall Islands rank
44th
Samoa rank
45th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • Samoa
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 0.9226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa, a difference of 0.0068 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Marshall Islands ranks 44th and Samoa ranks 45th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6297 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6197 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Marshall Islands
2000s 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Marshall Islands
2010s 0.9477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Marshall Islands
2020s 0.8467 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9868 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Marshall Islands or Samoa?
Marshall Islands, at 0.9226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Marshall Islands and Samoa?
0.0068 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Samoa?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Marshall Islands and Samoa rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Marshall Islands ranks 44th and Samoa ranks 45th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Marshall Islands vs Samoa: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/marshall-islands/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/marshall-islands/samoa/">Marshall Islands vs Samoa: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.