Malta vs Monaco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Malta
- Monaco
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.9796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.0419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Monaco ahead.
Malta ranks 42nd and Monaco ranks 43rd of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Monaco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2000s | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
| 2010s | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3319 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
| 2020s | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0847 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Malta or Monaco?
- Malta, at 0.9796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Malta and Monaco?
- 0.0419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Monaco?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Monaco rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Malta ranks 42nd and Monaco ranks 43rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.