Malaysia vs Ukraine: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Malaysia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports -0.111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ukraine ahead.
Malaysia ranks 112th and Ukraine ranks 109th of 206 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ukraine |
| 2000s | -0.4803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ukraine |
| 2010s | -0.329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ukraine |
| 2020s | -0.171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1724 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Malaysia or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at -0.111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Malaysia and Ukraine?
- 0.0157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Ukraine?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Ukraine rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Malaysia ranks 112th and Ukraine ranks 109th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.