Madagascar vs Tunisia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Madagascar
- Tunisia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports -0.6481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 137th and Tunisia ranks 138th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | -0.1592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.6314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | -0.4956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Madagascar or Tunisia?
- Madagascar, at -0.6481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Madagascar and Tunisia?
- 0.0021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Tunisia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar and Tunisia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Madagascar ranks 137th and Tunisia ranks 138th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.