Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Russian Federation: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Lao People's Democratic Republic
-1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Russian Federation
-1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
183rd
Russian Federation rank
182nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Russian Federation
-1.5-1-0.5199620102024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd and Russian Federation ranks 182nd of 206 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8555 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation
2000s -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation
2010s -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation
2020s -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2742 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Russian Federation?
0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Russian Federation rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd and Russian Federation ranks 182nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Russian Federation: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/lao-pdr/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/lao-pdr/russian-federation/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Russian Federation: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.