Kyrgyzstan vs Oman: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Kyrgyzstan
-0.8013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Oman
-0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
146th
Oman rank
149th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Oman
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports -0.8013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Oman, a difference of 0.0864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 146th and Oman ranks 149th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Oman Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan
2000s -0.8872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Oman
2010s -0.423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan
2020s -0.6348 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kyrgyzstan or Oman?
Kyrgyzstan, at -0.8013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Oman as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kyrgyzstan and Oman?
0.0864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Oman?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Oman rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 146th and Oman ranks 149th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Oman: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kyrgyz-republic/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kyrgyz-republic/oman/">Kyrgyzstan vs Oman: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.