Kosovo vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Kosovo
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Kosovo ranks 91st and Mongolia ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | -0.1505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0931 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kosovo or Mongolia?
- Kosovo, at 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kosovo and Mongolia?
- 0.0327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Mongolia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Kosovo and Mongolia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Kosovo ranks 91st and Mongolia ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.