Kenya vs Mexico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Kenya
-0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mexico
-0.2821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Kenya rank
124th
Mexico rank
122nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Kenya
  • Mexico
-1-0.500.5199620102025

How they compare

Mexico currently reports -0.2821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kenya, a difference of 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 124th and Mexico ranks 122nd of 208 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mexico
2000s -0.4079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2865 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mexico
2010s -0.3153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mexico
2020s -0.3333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1725 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kenya or Mexico?
Mexico, at -0.2821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kenya as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kenya and Mexico?
0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Kenya ranks 124th and Mexico ranks 122nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Mexico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kenya/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kenya/mexico/">Kenya vs Mexico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.