Kazakhstan vs Oman: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Kazakhstan
- Oman
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports -0.8157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Oman, a difference of 0.072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Oman ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Oman ranks 149th of 206 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Oman |
| 2000s | -0.9124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Oman |
| 2010s | -0.8627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Oman |
| 2020s | -0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kazakhstan or Oman?
- Kazakhstan, at -0.8157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 0.072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Oman rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Oman ranks 149th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.