Israel vs Republic of Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Israel
0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Israel rank
85th
Republic of Moldova rank
86th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Israel
  • Republic of Moldova
-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.0115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 85th and Republic of Moldova ranks 86th of 206 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2000s 0.6188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2010s 0.5171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2020s 0.4629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Israel or Republic of Moldova?
Israel, at 0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Israel and Republic of Moldova?
0.0115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Israel and Republic of Moldova rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Israel ranks 85th and Republic of Moldova ranks 86th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Republic of Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/israel/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/israel/moldova/">Israel vs Republic of Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.