Indonesia vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Indonesia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports -0.1551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0203 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.
Indonesia ranks 115th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2906 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lesotho |
| 2000s | -0.1759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.0549 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1684 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | -0.0081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Indonesia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at -0.1551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Indonesia and Lesotho?
- 0.0203 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Lesotho?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Lesotho rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Indonesia ranks 115th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.