Hungary vs Peru: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Hungary
- Peru
How they compare
Hungary currently reports -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Peru, a difference of 0.0185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 107th and Peru ranks 108th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1289 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.5077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.0688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Hungary or Peru?
- Hungary, at -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Hungary and Peru?
- 0.0185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Peru?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Peru rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Hungary ranks 107th and Peru ranks 108th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.