Honduras vs Madagascar: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Honduras
-0.5948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Madagascar
-0.6481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Honduras rank
136th
Madagascar rank
137th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Honduras
  • Madagascar
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102025

How they compare

Honduras currently reports -0.5948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Madagascar ahead.

Honduras ranks 136th and Madagascar ranks 137th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3684 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Madagascar
2000s -0.2831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Madagascar
2010s -0.4683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2020s -0.5802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Honduras or Madagascar?
Honduras, at -0.5948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Honduras and Madagascar?
0.0533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Madagascar?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Honduras and Madagascar rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Honduras ranks 136th and Madagascar ranks 137th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Madagascar: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/honduras/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/honduras/madagascar/">Honduras vs Madagascar: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.