Guinea-Bissau vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Guinea-Bissau
-0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Morocco
-0.7267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
143rd
Morocco rank
141st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Morocco
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Morocco currently reports -0.7267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Morocco ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 143rd and Morocco ranks 141st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Morocco Difference Ahead
1990s -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Morocco
2000s -0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Morocco
2010s -0.9112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Morocco
2020s -0.6081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Guinea-Bissau or Morocco?
Morocco, at -0.7267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Guinea-Bissau and Morocco?
0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Morocco?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Morocco rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 143rd and Morocco ranks 141st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guinea-bissau/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guinea-bissau/morocco/">Guinea-Bissau vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.