Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Guinea-Bissau recorded -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 32.2% on the previous year and down 35.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau peaked at -0.3646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005 and was at its lowest, -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2012.
That places Guinea-Bissau 158th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Guinea-Bissau, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.8968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.9651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.6% |
| 2000 | -0.7912 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.0% |
| 2002 | -0.6997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.6% |
| 2003 | -0.974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +39.2% |
| 2004 | -0.6613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.1% |
| 2005 | -0.3646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -44.9% |
| 2006 | -0.6105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +67.4% |
| 2007 | -0.7203 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.0% |
| 2008 | -0.7017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2009 | -0.6916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2010 | -0.7244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.7% |
| 2011 | -0.7487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.3% |
| 2012 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +51.0% |
| 2013 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2014 | -0.8717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.8% |
| 2015 | -0.7937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.9% |
| 2016 | -0.8231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2017 | -0.8645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.0% |
| 2018 | -0.7272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.9% |
| 2019 | -0.5136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.4% |
| 2020 | -0.4213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.0% |
| 2021 | -0.4444 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.5% |
| 2022 | -0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.0% |
| 2023 | -0.5756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.7% |
| 2024 | -0.8135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.3% |
| 2025 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.2% |
Guinea-Bissau compared with similar countries
- Guinea-Bissau's -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 86% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Guinea-Bissau's -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.6905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.8299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.6417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau
More reference data data for Guinea-Bissau
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0583 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3098 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.395 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.395 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1955 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2346 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1466 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau was -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The highest recorded value was -0.3646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2012.
- How does Guinea-Bissau rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 158th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.