Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Guinea-Bissau recorded -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 23.1% on the previous year and up 15.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau peaked at -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005 and was at its lowest, -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2012.
That places Guinea-Bissau 143rd out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9868 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.9112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.6081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau
More reference data data for Guinea-Bissau
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 8.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.395 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 41.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 884.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 109.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 51.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 413.82 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau was -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The highest recorded value was -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2012.
- How does Guinea-Bissau rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 143rd out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.