Guatemala vs Thailand: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Guatemala
-0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Thailand
-0.5598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guatemala rank
129th
Thailand rank
131st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Guatemala
  • Thailand
-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand, a difference of 0.089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Thailand ahead.

Guatemala ranks 129th and Thailand ranks 131st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2000s -0.3056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2010s -0.2995 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guatemala
2020s -0.4457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Guatemala or Thailand?
Guatemala, at -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Guatemala and Thailand?
0.089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Thailand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Thailand rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Guatemala ranks 129th and Thailand ranks 131st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Thailand: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guatemala/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guatemala/thailand/">Guatemala vs Thailand: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.