Guam vs Spain: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Guam
- Spain
How they compare
Guam currently reports 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Spain, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Spain ahead.
Guam ranks 26th and Spain ranks 28th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4933 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Spain |
| 2010s | 0.8898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Spain |
| 2020s | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Guam or Spain?
- Guam, at 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Spain as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Guam and Spain?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Spain?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Spain rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Guam ranks 26th and Spain ranks 28th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.