Grenada vs Romania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Grenada
- Romania
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania, a difference of 0.0422 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 73rd and Romania ranks 76th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.7878 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.388 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0.7109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.4329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Grenada or Romania?
- Grenada, at 0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Grenada and Romania?
- 0.0422 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Romania?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Romania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Grenada ranks 73rd and Romania ranks 76th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.