Grenada vs Romania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Grenada
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada, a difference of 0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 76th and Romania ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.7621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0.6407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.3065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Grenada or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Grenada and Romania?
- 0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Romania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Grenada ranks 76th and Romania ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.