Grenada vs Puerto Rico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Grenada
0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0.3782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Grenada rank
76th
Puerto Rico rank
77th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Grenada
  • Puerto Rico
0.20.40.60.81199620102024

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Grenada ranks 76th and Puerto Rico ranks 77th of 206 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico
2000s 0.7621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8932 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico
2010s 0.6407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1376 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico
2020s 0.3065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Grenada or Puerto Rico?
Grenada, at 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Grenada and Puerto Rico?
0.0005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Puerto Rico?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Grenada and Puerto Rico rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Grenada ranks 76th and Puerto Rico ranks 77th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Puerto Rico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/grenada/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/grenada/puerto-rico-us/">Grenada vs Puerto Rico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.