Ghana vs Kosovo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Ghana
- Kosovo
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0.2043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.0447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 88th and Kosovo ranks 91st of 206 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0.2572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.4398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0.2069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Ghana or Kosovo?
- Ghana, at 0.2043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Ghana and Kosovo?
- 0.0447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Kosovo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Kosovo rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Ghana ranks 88th and Kosovo ranks 91st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.