Georgia vs Macao: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Georgia
- Macao
How they compare
Georgia currently reports -0.3588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao, a difference of 0.0612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Macao ahead.
Georgia ranks 127th and Macao ranks 129th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2000s | -0.1767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2010s | 0.1799 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2020s | -0.0756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Georgia or Macao?
- Georgia, at -0.3588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Georgia and Macao?
- 0.0612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Macao?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Macao rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Georgia ranks 127th and Macao ranks 129th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.