Georgia vs Hong Kong, China: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Georgia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Georgia currently reports -0.2535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Georgia ranks 118th and Hong Kong, China ranks 119th of 207 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | -0.2034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 0.1259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | -0.0513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0867 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Georgia or Hong Kong, China?
- Georgia, at -0.2535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Georgia ranks 118th and Hong Kong, China ranks 119th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.