El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

El Salvador
-0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
-0.8013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
El Salvador rank
145th
Kyrgyzstan rank
147th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • El Salvador
  • Kyrgyzstan
-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports -0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 145th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 207 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2000s -0.0519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2010s -0.0472 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2020s -0.4851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6348 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1497 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
El Salvador, at -0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
0.0129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
El Salvador ranks 145th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/kyrgyz-republic/">El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.