Ecuador vs Nepal: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Ecuador
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -0.0598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 106th and Nepal ranks 104th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4403 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | -0.1519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | -0.2776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | -0.1107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0975 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0132 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Ecuador or Nepal?
- Nepal, at -0.0598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Ecuador and Nepal?
- 0.0453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 106th and Nepal ranks 104th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.