Ecuador vs Guyana: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Ecuador
- Guyana
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guyana, a difference of 0.0023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guyana ahead.
Ecuador ranks 106th and Guyana ranks 107th of 206 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
| 2000s | -0.1519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
| 2010s | -0.2776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
| 2020s | -0.1107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Ecuador or Guyana?
- Ecuador, at -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Ecuador and Guyana?
- 0.0023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guyana?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Guyana rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 106th and Guyana ranks 107th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.