Croatia vs Poland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Croatia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia, a difference of 0.1035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Poland ahead.
Croatia ranks 58th and Poland ranks 56th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.5583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.5109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.6068 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1279 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Croatia or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Croatia and Poland?
- 0.1035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Poland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Poland rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Croatia ranks 58th and Poland ranks 56th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.