Côte d'Ivoire vs Rwanda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Côte d'Ivoire
-0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Rwanda
-0.5889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Côte d'Ivoire rank
133rd
Rwanda rank
132nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Rwanda
-1.5-1-0.5199620102024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports -0.5889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Rwanda ranks 132nd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Côte d'Ivoire
2000s -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Rwanda
2010s -0.7151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8539 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1387 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Côte d'Ivoire
2020s -0.659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0774 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Côte d'Ivoire or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at -0.5889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Côte d'Ivoire and Rwanda?
0.0278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Rwanda rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Rwanda ranks 132nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Rwanda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cote-d-ivoire/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cote-d-ivoire/rwanda/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Rwanda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.