Cote d'Ivoire vs Madagascar: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports -0.5427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.1054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Madagascar ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 134th and Madagascar ranks 137th of 208 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.8909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.6394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2020s | -0.5515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cote d'Ivoire or Madagascar?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at -0.5427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar?
- 0.1054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 134th and Madagascar ranks 137th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.