Central African Republic vs Qatar: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Central African Republic
-1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Qatar
-1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
174th
Qatar rank
177th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Qatar
-1.6-1.4-1.2-1-0.8199620102025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Qatar, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 174th and Qatar ranks 177th of 208 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2000s -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2010s -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2020s -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Central African Republic or Qatar?
Central African Republic, at -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Qatar as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Central African Republic and Qatar?
0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Qatar?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Qatar rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Central African Republic ranks 174th and Qatar ranks 177th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Qatar: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/qatar/">Central African Republic vs Qatar: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.