Cayman Islands vs Chile: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Cayman Islands
0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Chile
0.9942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cayman Islands rank
39th
Chile rank
36th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Chile
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.9942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.0365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cayman Islands ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 39th and Chile ranks 36th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5975 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2000s 0.9318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 0.671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 0.8725 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cayman Islands or Chile?
Chile, at 0.9942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cayman Islands and Chile?
0.0365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Cayman Islands and Chile rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Cayman Islands ranks 39th and Chile ranks 36th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Chile: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cayman-islands/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cayman-islands/chile/">Cayman Islands vs Chile: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.