Bulgaria vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Bulgaria
0.2687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Suriname
0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
86th
Suriname rank
88th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Suriname
00.20.40.60.8199620102025

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 0.2687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Suriname, a difference of 0.0309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 86th and Suriname ranks 88th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0.268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bulgaria
2000s 0.5619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bulgaria
2010s 0.3387 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Suriname
2020s 0.3061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bulgaria or Suriname?
Bulgaria, at 0.2687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Suriname as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bulgaria and Suriname?
0.0309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Suriname?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Bulgaria and Suriname rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Bulgaria ranks 86th and Suriname ranks 88th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bulgaria/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bulgaria/suriname/">Bulgaria vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.