Bulgaria vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Bulgaria
0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0.1647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bulgaria rank
87th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
90th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.20.40.60.8199620102024

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 87th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.5382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bulgaria
2010s 0.2436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bulgaria
2020s 0.2109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bulgaria or Sao Tome and Principe?
Bulgaria, at 0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bulgaria and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bulgaria and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Bulgaria ranks 87th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bulgaria/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bulgaria/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bulgaria vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.