Brunei vs Mozambique: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Brunei
-0.9538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mozambique
-0.9014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Brunei rank
152nd
Mozambique rank
149th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Brunei
  • Mozambique
-1-0.75-0.5-0.250199620102025

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports -0.9014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei, a difference of 0.0524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Brunei ranks 152nd and Mozambique ranks 149th of 208 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2301 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7868 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2000s -0.8639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0807 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2010s -0.7688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2020s -0.9513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Brunei or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at -0.9014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Brunei and Mozambique?
0.0524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Mozambique?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Brunei and Mozambique rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Brunei ranks 152nd and Mozambique ranks 149th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei vs Mozambique: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/mozambique/">Brunei vs Mozambique: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.