Brunei vs Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Brunei
-0.7999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
-0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Brunei rank
145th
Guinea-Bissau rank
143rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Brunei
  • Guinea-Bissau
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei, a difference of 0.0211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brunei ahead.

Brunei ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 143rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9422 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brunei
2000s -0.8021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2010s -0.6046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brunei
2020s -0.7991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Brunei or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at -0.7788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Brunei and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Brunei and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Brunei ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 143rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei vs Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/guinea-bissau/">Brunei vs Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.