Brazil vs Republic of Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Brazil
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.3165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.0328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 83rd and Republic of Moldova ranks 86th of 206 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2719 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3893 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0.5242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.1678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Brazil or Republic of Moldova?
- Brazil, at 0.3165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Brazil and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.0328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Republic of Moldova?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Republic of Moldova rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Brazil ranks 83rd and Republic of Moldova ranks 86th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.