Botswana vs Israel: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Botswana
0.3959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Israel
0.3902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Botswana rank
80th
Israel rank
82nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Botswana
  • Israel
0.20.40.60.8199620102025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.3959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel, a difference of 0.0057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 80th and Israel ranks 82nd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Israel Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1364 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2000s 0.6542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2010s 0.4435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2020s 0.3129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Botswana or Israel?
Botswana, at 0.3959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Botswana and Israel?
0.0057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Israel?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Israel rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Botswana ranks 80th and Israel ranks 82nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Israel: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/israel/">Botswana vs Israel: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.