Botswana vs Israel: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Botswana
- Israel
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.2953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel, a difference of 0.0001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 84th and Israel ranks 85th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0117 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.1971 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Botswana or Israel?
- Botswana, at 0.2953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Botswana and Israel?
- 0.0001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Israel?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Israel rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Botswana ranks 84th and Israel ranks 85th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.